The Active X control is
for Windows Media Player. The file is below the player
for download.
Apollo 15 Command Module
Photo
AS15-94-12741HR
Take a look
at the photos below first if you prefer but the text analyzes and explains
what I think is in them. All off-site links as well as the images open
in a new window so you can do comparisons.
This next clip is of a relatively
high-res Apollo 15 photo from 119km above the Moon's surface. While waiting
for the LM to return, the Command Service Module Pilot Al Worden, was doing
experiments and taking more photos. (70mm Hasselblad, Mapping Metric and
Panoramic) He also used hand-held 35mm SLR cameras from inside the CSM.
It looks like there are two structures
similar to operations where I've worked at one time.
Other areas in the image could
be related. There are two versions of this photo.
Here's the actual two versions
at original resolutions from their respective sites:
This
is a very low-res version. All the photos in this magazine were scanned
at lo-res. and there isn't any real detail in any of them.
...
...
...
The Reason I Think These
Are Structures In AS15-94-12741HR
They seem to have straight-line
3D symmetrical shape in a configuration I'm familiar with. Shadows and
shading are consistent with the images light direction. The outer edges
of these "structures" conform to the surface terrain around them. The left
structure's north end looks like there's industrial pipelines going into
the ground.
The resemblance of NASA and other
industries designs is very close. (comparison below) I was employed in
the early 70's at an underground mining operation in NT, Australia that
had a similar type of surface-to-subterranean layout. We used underground
to surface conveying systems, protected within the pipelines.
Other shafts and pipelines contained
access and personnel corridors, equipment transport and side-connected
tubes for workshops, engineering offices and break-rooms. Self contained,
climate controlled and some large enough to drive through.
Much like these underground and
in-mountain inserts and connectors, being constructed at Kirtland AFB for the Manzano
Weapons Storage Facility located there. (Note they're big enough to drive
into and these are small ones) The longer one shows the blast doors installed
and the left end is open.
See the huge crane under the
camouflage netting?
After verifying all the components
fit properly, it's disconnected in smaller sections for transport. Then
depending on the underground configuration, "T" and /or "Y" connectors are attached to branch off into
other tubes. And for everybody's information, these are also used for access
and expansion of existing underground bases that I guarantee you, do exist.
(I have place marks at these
in Google Earth titled: Large Tube & Larger Tube)
Kirtland AFB
370ft Long Tube Under Construction (click image for larger view)
830ft Long Tube Under Construction (click image for larger view)
Pegasus Addition:
Many people have asked us how
can they hide things, especially since Google Earth can see everywhere.
Discounting the fact that Google Earth can easily be edited ( I am sure
there are sensitive areas in the world the government will not let them
look at) here Jack has found clear visual proof of just how easy it is
to hide things from space cameras. Below you will see camouflage netting
that has been only partially deployed and you can see a huge machime, bigger
than buildings on the site, partially hidden. Notice the texture of the
tent... if it was complete, it would look like a piece of natural terrain.
It is noteworthy at this point to mention that Guy Cramer, one of the three
people who own most of the mineral
rights on the moon owns HyperStealth
Biotechnology Corp a company that specializes in camouflaging large
structures. One of their contracts is the H.A.R.R.P
facility in Alaska.
So if we are assuming that they
are hiding things from us on the Moon and Mars, you can see how much more
difficult it is finding anomalies, never mind any editting or touch up
on photos afterwards.
Closeup of camouflage netting
at Kirtland AFB
Image Courtesy Guy Cramer
Compressor with current
monotone color
Image Courtesy Guy Cramer
Compressor with Tumbleweed-6A-100
camouflage paint
Underground Mining and Processing
Sites. Along with habitat and laboratory modules. And possibly support
sites in the near areas.
Before you call the nearest institution
on me, consider this... The caption in the version from the Apollo site
reads: "Lunar Orbit View: Lobate Landslip Outside Northeastern Rim Of Tsiolkovsky"
The landslide debris is the "chunky" area at bottom left in the photo.
What better mining conditions when you have a massive section of wall several
miles wide and hundreds of feet high already collapsed?
On one of the largest ejecta
blankets on the planet....(more on that below) And Tsiolkovsky is considered
one of the more recent impact craters, in geological time.
The first site is just above
the bulk of the rubble. The second site looks to be 3 to 5 miles to the
east in this images orientation. Because of the Command Orbiter's flight
path, east is actually NNW in the Hi-Res photo. The scaled image width
of the photo is approximately 15 miles.
So what's being mined?
Any number of minerals and elements.
Titanium, Helium3, Regolith, Gold and possibly elements or minerals that
don't exist on Earth.
And oxygen!
Scientists and astronomers have
already confirmed that craters are disappearing from the surface. Past
large impacts splattered sub-surface material and what's left of the meteor,
asteroid or comet in what's called ejecta all around the newly formed crater.
Astronauts brought back crater ejecta full of oxygen. It makes sense that
this can be mined and stored in underground silos or containment vessels
for later use.
Pegasus Note: See LPI document 6034.pdf
This document is about ISRU mining of Lunar dust and regolith to produce
glass from Solar furnaces to make fiberglass stuctures on the Moon. As
a byproduct of this glass making process they get iron oxide and titanium
oxide, AND free oxygen to use for breathing and making rocket fuel (liquid
oxygen)
The term ISRU is something you
need to get famliar with... it means In Situ Resource Utilization... in
otherwords what IS on the Moon , STAYS on the Moon..
...
...
...
The following is an excerpt
from;
The NASA Moon Photos
My Story of dealing with NASA in the 1970's
by Vito Saccheri
"In 1980, another puzzle piece fell
into place. A friend had shown me a special congressional subcommittee
report on moon rocks brought back by the astronauts and a feasibility study
on colonizing the moon. The document was dated 1972 or `73 and concluded
that moon colonization using giant plastic air bubbles was unrealistic
and that we would need to transport air from the earth. The congressional
report concluded that there was plenty of oxygen on the moon trapped in
the rocks. The recommended solution: pulverize the rocks on a large scale
with major excavations. The liberated oxygen would be stored in underground
caverns and tunnel systems and the debris from these pulverized rocks dumped
into the existing craters. Naturally, the craters would eventually disappear,
an observation made by astronomers long before the first moon landings
and, ironically, one that had initially prompted Leonard and other scientists
of the 1950s to analyze early moon photos".
written by a former NASA scientist, George H. Leonard.
Leonard had been working in the photo intelligence division of NASA. My
note: Why would NASA have the need for a photo intelligence division? I
can think of only one reason....they have photos they don't want us to
see. I have seen this book (paperback version)
and
it doesn't show anything in the grainy photos that he sees but the info
in it is interesting.
...
...
...
OK...enough of my, "You
must be nuts" theory.
However, not one person in the
scientific community or NASA circles has explained to me in any uncertain
terms as to what these shapes are! So I'm allowed. One more point. Now
the question is...
Who is doing the mining?
Well...if astronomers have been
watching craters disappear long before we sent our first Moon landing....?
And then there's these... Operations
in progress today...
One of the Atlas Copco rigs emerging from the new incline shaft.
The following is the text for
these two photos:
#1: "Gloria "(shaft name) combined
a vertical shaft for personnel and materials hoisting with a long incline
shaft for vehicle access and conveyor hoisting of the ore to a surface
crushing, screening and washing plant".
"The new expansion follows
this design, having a 2,200m-long incline shaft and the 500m-deep No.3
personnel shaft. There is also a new ventilation shaft, and a workshop
located on the 400 level".
#2:For the new area, Assmang
requested a three-boom rig fitted with two rock drills for face work plus
one for roof-bolting, so the mine can drill holes for roof bolts and face-blast
holes from the same set-up. Atlas Copco has supplied four purpose-designed
Rocket Boomer M3D rigs.
In Copernicus Crater (See
The Living Moon pages) we found evidence of just such a tube structure...
The resolution on the copy of LO-III-162 that we have from an original
unretouched 16x20 negative is extremely high res, but because of the scale
objects are still difficult to find....
Tube Enlarged from Original High Res Image
Tube Highlighted to show detail. The tube
comes out of a dark hole and bends, clearly showing a support. This Tube
is in an area that shows other structures consitant with a mining operation (See The Living Moon)
Tube sketch. The visible features of the tube
in this image
Tube from existing Mine on Earth
...
...
...
Getting back to the photo
again...
The reflectivity of the shapes
are consistent with other areas in the image and not overly over-exposed.
It can be determined the shapes are in the photo and not on the glass or
negative by analyzing the focal point. If on the glass or negative, after
being re-photographed and later scanned, the shapes would be over exposed
into a "blooming" effect, giving the edges and the bulk of the shapes a
bright Gaussian type blur. Much brighter than the images brightest feature.
The focal point being the surface terrain, shows these objects consistency
of pixilation with the area around them when enlarged.
Debris on the glass or negative
would pixilate at different levels. And if debris, it would be closer to
the scanning light than the subject being scanned, making them blurrier
and brighter. And here's something everyone should know. Like most new
technologies, scanners were available to the military long before they
became available to the public. Although most were re-photographed in smaller
sections from the large mosaics into 16x20 prints.
The AS15-94-12741 photo is not
from a mosaic, it was taken with the 70mm Hasselblad. You'll see what looks
like hair or fibers in the scanned Hi Res photo. On closer inspection,
they are actually rilles and channels created by smaller impacts in the
area. I first thought the shapes were common errors created from debris
on the scanner glass or an anomaly in the negative until I enlarged it
and took a closer look at the two shapes that are visible without enlargement.
Some of the smaller specks, smudges and dark lines scattered around this
image, are probably from the scanner glass, on the camera window or negative
itself.
Why I Think The Shapes Are Not
Scanning Or Other Errors
On the Lunar and Planetary Institute(LPI)
site, there are dozens of mosaics (of the Lunar Orbiter images) that have
developing and scanning errors. Some are caused by developing solutions
drying on the negatives. Some are oily fingerprints transferred to the
negatives. Others have sticky-tape residue on them.
I'm sure cosmic radiation had
a hand in creating film anomalies.
Some look like an airman spilled
beer on them. (Karl Wolfe)?
Others show tape or clips that
were used to hold the
print strips in place when creating
mosaics.
And numerous other causes.
But
most of them are dried
condensation on the negatives and prints from poor
storage practices before and
after the mosaics were created.
When scanned in visible light
scanners, these errors get
overexposed and create the blurry
patterns.
But it's hard to tell which came
first, photos that were scanned then re-photographed...
or re-photographed prints that
were scanned and then digitally re-photographed.
It really doesn't matter, the
fact that they have these errors is the point.
And I've seen some web sites
that claim these patterns are bases. They are not.
It's too bad some people manipulate
photos to "enhance" the area.
And when it doesn't look quite
real enough, all boundaries are crossed
in the name of sensationalism
and authenticity. And no matter
how many sets of letters are
behind someone's name, detail can't be created
by making it bigger than it was
meant to be viewed.
If the original photo doesn't
show any detail at just 100%, there isn't any!
The more you enlarge any photo,
the less detail you have
and more pixilation at the same time, resulting
in shapes seemingly taking on
transmutations but usually with some help. The same goes for
hi-res scans of lo-res photo
negatives.
Even in this hi-res scanned photo
I found. In fact, I've removed all the enlargements
I've made on other pages because
they really don't bring out any detail, just larger pixels.
(with the exception of the Wisps
and the circular object which are only 2x enlargement)
But this AS15 photo does show
detail at just 100%
so enlarging it doesn't alter
its shape or form.
And everyone should know, I'm
not claiming anything in these pages, and haven't.
Just sharing my observations,
theories and experiences as well as knowledge on photography and optics.
There is only two ways to confirm
what's real or not...
The authority that created it
comes forward with all the data or
we go there ourselves.........I'll
volunteer.
In another section below, I've
include a few to show you what these common and uncommon errors look like.
You'll see that the errors extend
into space, well away from the surface and some, off the edge of the negative
itself.
(These web sites don't show you
that part)
You'll agree they all are completely
different from the two shapes in this photo.
I have looked at every photo
(thousands) on these two sites over the years
and there isn't one other photo
with the same shapes as in AS15-94-12741HR.
If anyone has, I would like to
know the photo # please.
One more note: I was so intrigued
with this photo I emailed the authority
that scans the negatives
in a very high resolution .tif format for the public. (57Mb).
)
