Electrogravitics Reference List
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 15:40:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Robert Stirniman
Subject: Updated Electrogravitics List
This file contains an electrogravitics reference
list, copied ad hoc from various other files
and sources, with commentary by yours truly.
Prepared by: Robert Stirniman (robert@wwa.com)
This Update: March 1, 1996
Danger Will Robinson! Some of the following information is serious,
and some is nonsense. Some of the things that might at first seem
to be nonsense, are not. And some things referenced below, which
come from serious credentialed scientists, are in fact nonsense.
Whatever the case, it's been included. Good luck sorting it out.
Understanding gravity is a matter of time.
SHORTCUTS
Internet Sites
Elektromagnum web site by David Jonsson:
http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/
KeelyNet:
http://www.keelynet.com/http://www.newphys.se/elektromagnum/physics/KeelyNet/
Los Alamos National Lab Physics E-Print Archive:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/
Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry:
http://vishnu.nirvana.phys.psu.edu/
Bill Beaty's Weird Science, Anomalous Physics, Free-Energy, Tesla Society:
http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/freenrg/antigrav.html
The Institute For New Energy, Patrick Bailey, homepage :
http://www.padrak.com/ine/
Digital Equipment Corp's Alta Vista web search engine. If you can't
find it with this, it ain't out there yet. http://www.altavista.digital.com/
Elsevier Science. Search or browse the table of contents of more than
900 science and technology journals. Data since early 1995.
http://www.elsevier.nl/cas/estoc/
Norman Redington's website, The Net Advance of Physics, recent preprints
and papers describing new developments in physics: http://pobox.com/~redingtn
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University's Aerospace Virtual Library: http://macwww.db.erau.edu/www_virtual_lib/aerospace.html
Jack R. Hunt Memorial Library (aerospace):
http://amelia.db.erau.edu/
American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics (AIAA) home page:
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/group/aiaa/national
NASA Langley Research Center Library: http://blearg.larc.nasa.gov/library/larc-lib.html
NASA Scientific and Technical Information:
http://www.sti.nasa.gov/STI-homepage.html
University of Alabama at Hunstville. Dr Ning Li and Dr Douglas Torr.
Microgravity research consultants to NASA's Marshall Space Center. http://isl-garnet.uah.edu/RR93/uahmatsci.html
The Microgravity Research Experiments (MICREX) Data Base http://samson2.msfc.nasa.gov/fame/exps/kaw-sl3.html
Interstellar Propulsion Society: http://www.digimark.net/ips/
National Science Foundation World Wide Web Server. Find out where your
science tax dollars are going. http://stis.nsf.gov/
Nexus magazine web page:
http://www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/
Home page of New Scientist magazine: http://www.newscientist.com/pstourist/index.html
The Farce of Physics: http://www.germany.eu.net/books/farce
The World Wide Web Virtual Library: Sumeria/Technology
http://lablinks.com/sumeria/tech.html
The Society for the Advancement of Autodynamics website:
http://www.webcom.com/~saa
Popular Mechanics' Tech Update Article Archive:
http://popularmechanics.com/cgi-bin/wais.pl
Fortean web site: http://www.clas.ufl.edu/anthro/fortpages.html.
Homepage of Apeiron Magazine: http://montreal.aei.ca:80/~apeiron/
Borderland Sciences Research Foundation ftp site:
ftp:
northcoast.com/pub/bsrf
Homepage of the International Society of Unified Science, for advancing
the Reciprocal System Theory of Dewey B.Larson: http://infox.eunet.cz/interpres/sr/isus/index.html
Frank Lofaro's homepage, including alternative science links, and two
articles by Whittaker written in 1903 and 1904 about scalar field theory
and free energy:
http://www.unlv.edu/~ftlofaro/
Homepage of the Oppositely Charged Twin Monopole (OCTM) theory of matter,
"Gravity is a Push", US patent number 5,377,936:
http://www.epicom.com/gravitypush
Dr Eujin Jeong's Dipole Theory of Gravity homepage:
http://www.realtime.net/~ejeong
Levesque's (laurent@ee.umanitoba.ca) web site:
http://www.ee.umanitoba.ca/~laurent
UFOs and the New Physics: http://www.hia.com/hia/pcr/ufo.html
FOREWORD
There is a fairly large body of evidence which supports the idea
of a strong relationship, and possibly an equivalent fundamental source,
for electromagnetism and gravitation. Many references to this effect are
contained in this resource list. But for now, let's forget about the experimental
evidence and theoretical ideas which are presented here, and begin with
first principles.
What if our knowledge of physics had evolved differently?
What if no one had ever given a thought to any theory of gravitation,
before we discovered the principles and theories of electromagnetics and
the two nuclear forces. We might have developed some fairly good theories
which unify the "three" forces. We would know that clumps of matter are
held together primarily by electromagnetic forces. And we would find experimentally
that if we separate some of these clumps of matter, a small force continues
to exist which trys to bring them back together. Would it seem rational
to speculate that this force is something entirely new and completely different
from electromagnetics? Would it not be a great foolishness to invent something
new and call it gravity and claim that it has no relationship with the
known forces, and then write elaborate mathematical theories which describe
it solely as geometry? Or, would it be more rational to see it as what
it probably is -- a manifestation of the electromagnetic forces which we
already know to hold matter together?
Could it be that electric charge is a fundamental thing, and inertial
mass is merely a shadow of something primal, and what we know as a gravitational
field is merely the net result of other primary fields? Geometrize it if
you find it useful to do so, but please recognize that defining gravity
as geometry lends no information to the understanding of its cause. Of
all the forces we know, there is none stronger than a paradigm. -- Robert
Stirniman
GENERAL RELATIVITY & QUANTUM COSMOLOGY, ABSTRACT GR-QC/9512027
From: kldalton@cs.clemson.edu
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 11:30:30 -0500
Author(s): Kenneth Dalton
Journal-ref: Hadronic J. 17 (1994) 483-501
Hypothesis: The electromagnetic field is the source of gravitation.
This treatment of gravitation is consistent with the quantum theory of
matter, which holds that electric charge (or `generalized charge') is the
most fundamental attribute of matter. Experimental predictions of the theory
include: (1) any massive body generates a time-dependent gravitational
field; (2) there is a linear correlation between the gravitational red-shift
of a stellar source and the energy of cosmic rays emitted by that source,
given by $ {\Delta \nu}/{\nu_0} = energy (eV)/10^{27} $; (3) the maximum
energy of cosmic rays is $ 10^{27} $ eV; (4) this limit is associated with
an infinitely red-shifted stellar object, an ``electrostatic black-hole,''
at the potential $ c^2/G^{1/2} = 10^{27} $ volts. Finally, the theory predicts
that the gravitational potential near any charged elementary particle is
many orders of magnitude greater than the Newtonian value.
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS - THEORY, ABSTRACT HEP-TH/9601066
From: Kenichi Horie
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 14:41:29 +0900
Geometric Interpretation of Electromagnetism in a Gravitational Theory
with Torsion and Spinorial Matter Author(s): Kenichi Horie (KEK Japan)
Comments: Ph.D. thesis, 98 pages, LaTeX file, ca 276kB Possible geometric
frameworks for a unified theory of gravity and electromagnetism are investigated:
General relativity is enlarged by allowing for an arbitrary complex linear
connection and by constructing an extended spinor derivative based on the
complex connection. Thereby the spacetime torsion not only is coupled to
the spin of fermions and causes a four-fermion contact interaction, but
the non-metric vector-part of torsion is also related to the electromagnetic
potential. However, this long-standing relation is shown to be valid only
in a special U(1) gauge, and it is a formal consequence of the underlying
extended geometry.
Salem, Kenneth G.
The new gravity : a new force, a new mass, a new acceleration : unifying
gravity with light / Kenneth G. Salem. 1st ed. Johnstown, PA : Salem Books,
c1994. xiii, 181 p. : ill. ; 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: QC794.6.G7 S26 1994
SUBJECTS: Unified field theories. Gravitation. Electromagnetic interactions.
ISBN: 0962539813
Green, James A.
Gravitation & the electroform model : from general relativity to
unified field theory / by James A. Green. 7th ed. [Wichita, Kan.] : Greenwood
Research, c1994. 33 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: QC178 .G68 1994
SUBJECTS: Gravitation. Unified field theories. Astrophysics. "Wichita
State University Physics Graduate Seminar, Dec.1993 and Dec. 1994"
Another very interesting research on anti-gravity is done (and still
going on) by the Japanese prof. Shinishi SEIKE. He published his findings
in the book " The Principles of Ultra Relativity ". For his highly mathematical
(no nonsense) book write to: Shinichi SEIKE G Research Institute Box 33
UWAJIMA/Ehime (798) JAPAN
PATENTS
Patents for anti-gravity devices and systems have been issued to Brown,
Hooper, Wallace, and others.
US Patents Awarded to Townsend Brown --
300,311 T.T.Brown Nov. 15, 1928 A Method of and an Apparatus or Machine
for Producing Force or Motion 1,974,483 T.T.Brown Sept. 25, 1934 Electrostatic
Motor
2,949,550 T.T.Brown Aug. 16, 1960 Electrokinetic Apparatus
3,022,430 T.T.Brown Feb. 20, 1962 Electrokinetic Generator
3,187,206 T.T.Brown June 1, 1965 Electrokinetic Apparatus
3,296,491 T.T.Brown Jan. 3, 1967 Method and Apparatus for Producing
Ions and Electrically-Charged Aerosols 3,518,462 T.T.Brown June 30, 1970
Fluid Flow Control System
Dr. late William J. Hooper, BA, MA, PhD in Physics was
affiliated with the University of California at Berkley, and was Professor
Emeritus, when he died in 1971. His works are documented and he gained
two U.S. patents for his "ALL-ELECTRIC MOTIONAL FIELD GENERATOR". He claimed
use of the "Motional Electric Field" to produce gravity and anti-gravity
for use in SPACECRAFT and AIRCRAFT. Indeed, in U.S. patent #3,610,971 you
can see a Flying Saucer diagram is used as an example in Figure 7.
James Hartman, CaluNET Future Science Administrator
US Patent #3,610,971. "All Electric Motional Electric Field Generator",
Awarded to William Hooper, April 1969
US Patent # 3,656,013. "Apparatus for Generating Motional Electric Field",
Awarded to William Hooper, April 1972
Hooper, W. J. (1974). New Horizons in Electric, Magnetic and Gravitational
Field Theory, Electrodynamic Gravity, Inc. 1969
Frances G. Gibson, "THE ALL-ELECTRIC FIELD GENERATOR AND ITS POTENTIAL",
Electrodynamic Gravity, Inc., 1983
"Electric Propulsion Study"
Dr. Dennis Cravens, SAIC Corp, prepared for USAF Astronautics Lab at
Edwards AFB, August 1990 -- Section 3.7 Non-Inductive Coils Several authors
have suggested that v x B term in the Lorentz expression should be called
into question. Several unverified experimental results have ever been made.
An experiment is suggested to test one or several of these theoretical
views. This is an area where the experimental procedure is workable and
the outcome could have direct results in the area of inertia forces.
During the late 60's William J. Hooper put forth an interesting theory
involving the v x B terms dynamic electrical circuits. There was and is
uncertainty as to the exact physical understanding of the Biot-Savart-Lorentz
law and Ampere's law involving the set of reaction forces. Peter Graneau
has studied these expressions. Hoopers view was that there are three different
types of electric fields due to the distribution of electric field, and
two due to induction.
At the heart of the issue is the connection of the magnetic field and
its source in the charged particles. EM theory is presently consistent
with the idea that spinning magnetic dipoles create effects indistinguishable
from charged particles. There has been no critical experiment which can
disprove whether a magnetic flux rotates with its source. If it does co-move
with its source then it is logical to assume that a motional electric field
in a fixed reference frame of the current induces a magnetic field. This
concept is likewise consistent with a field-free interpretation such as
Ampere's original laws. (with 4 pages more about Hooper's theories)
FREE FALL OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES:
ON MOVING BODIES AND THEIR ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCES
by Nils Rognerud 1994 (nils@ccnet.com) (available at the elektromagnum
web site)
This paper is a review of the problem of the observable action of gravitational
forces on charged particles. The author discusses the induced electric
fields and the sometimes overlooked unique physical properties. He analyzes
several experiments, showing the reality of the induced electric fields.
The current interpretation, based on the idea of only one electric field,
with certain characteristics, is compared with alternative approaches.
The Hooper Coil:
The author has tested a setup by pulsing strong currents, opposite
and equal, through multiple parallel conductors. The configuration of the
conductors in this type of experiment will cancel the B-fields, while still
producing an Em field, in accordance with Eq. 4.2. This is similar to an
experiment by Hooper (W. J. Hooper), who successfully predicted and measured
the motional electric field - all in zero resultant B-field.
Interestingly, all of the above experiments can influence an electron
with a zero B-field, in the region of the electron. This has some profound
implications - one of which is that the motional electric force field is
immune to electrostatic or magnetic shielding. Experimentally, it can be
confirmed that the motional electric field is immune to shielding and follows
the boundary conditions of the magnetic (not electric) field. The only
way to shield a motional electric field is to use a magnetic shield around
the source of the magnetic flux - containing it at the source. These effects
are not startling if one remembers that the motional electric field is
a magnetic effect and that a magnetic field has a different boundary condition
than the electric field.
US Patent #3626605 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Secondary
Gravitational Force Field" Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec
14, 1971
US Patent #3626606 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Dynamic
Force Field" Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec 14, 1971
US Patent #3823570 -- "Heat Pump" (based on technology similar to the
above two inventions) Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Freeport NY July 16,
1973
Gravity is a PUSH!
United States Patent Number 5,377,936
NET KINETIC ENERGY DIFFERENTIAL GUIDANCE
AND PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SATELLITES AND SPACE VEHICLES
In the early 1960s, Erwin Saxl conducted a series of experiments
which seemed to illustrate a non-zero coupling between EM and gravitational
fields. He claimed to see a change in the period of a torque pendulum when
its electric potential was raised.
US Patent # 3357253 -- "Device and Method for Measuring Gravitational
and Other Forces", awarded to E.J. Saxl, December 1967
"An Electrically Charged Torque Pendulum", by E.J. Saxl, Nature 203,
Page 136, July 11 1963.
US patent number #5,076,971.
Barker places radioactive elements inside the sphere of a Van de Graaff
generator, runs it at a negative potential for several minutes/hours/days
-- and finds that the rate of radioactive decay is extremely enhanced --
with some relationship to the magnitude of the negative potential.
The principal investigator undertook a series of experiments to test
the "Barker effect" and the "Keller Catalytic Process" in changing the
rate of radioactive decay of heavy elements (elements heavier than lead,
such as radium, thorium, or uranium, all of which are radioactive). Barker
claims that subjecting radioactive materials to high electrostatic potentials
(50,000 volts to 500,000 volts) can increase or decrease the rate of radioactive
decay, with short exposures of the high voltage capable of inducing erratic
decay rates which slowly return to normal over a period of weeks. Keller
claims that subjecting radioactive materials to the high heat and fusing
reaction of a chemical process (Keller Catalytic Process) can eliminate
the radioactivity completely. -- Michael Mandeville http://www.aa.net/~mwm/dexmrad1.html
Carr, Otis (1959). "Amusement Device," (i.e. A Flying Saucer),
US Patent No. 2,912,244.
Otis Carr's work involved counter-rotating charged discs that supposedly
produced thrust when they reached a certain speed in relation the the earth's
rotational speed and became activated by free energy from space. Maybe
he did have something." -- James E. Cox
Carr's work is similar in some respects to Hooper's inventions. In both
cases, an anti-gravitational effect is reported to result from equal and
opposite electric currents. Furthermore, one of Hooper's embodiments, the
pancake coil, has an uncanny resemblance to the gravitational shielding
experiments which were recently conducted in Tampere Finland (1992 and
1995). Except that in the Tampere experiments, the equal and opposite current
is generated in a superconductor disk by way of the Meissner effect. Will
we soon begin to recognize value of the discoveries that Carr made nearly
40 years ago, and Hooper made over 25 years ago? -- Robert Stirniman
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF HOOPER'S GRAVITY-ELECTROMAGNETIC COUPLING CONCEPT
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Lewis Research Center,
Cleveland, OH.
MILLIS, MARC G. WILLIAMSON, GARY SCOTT JUN. 1995 12 PAGES Presented
at the 31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, San Diego CA, 10-12
Jul. 1995; sponsored by AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE NASA-TM-106963 E-9719
NAS 1.15:106963 AIAA PAPER 95-2601 Avail: CASI HC A03/MF A01 Experiments
were conducted to test assertions from Patent 3,610,971, by W.J. Hooper
that self-canceling electromagnetic coils can reduce the weight of objects
placed underneath. No weight changes were observed within the detectability
of the instrumentation. More careful examination of the patent and other
reports from Hooper led to the conclusion that Hooper may have misinterpreted
thermal effects as his 'Motional Field' effects. There is a possibility
that the claimed effects are below the detection thresholds of the instrumentation
used for these tests. CASI Accession Number: N95-28893
I have two problems with the methodology used by the NASA scientists
in the above experiment.
First -- The amount of ampere-turns used in the NASA experiment was
substantially lower than the amount used by Hooper. Hooper found that his
effect increased in proportion the square of the current. If you were motivated
to verify that the Hooper effect exists, would you not try to conduct the
experiment with MORE current, rather than less?
Second -- NASA conducted it's tests by energizing the coils and making
measurements in an immediate on-off mode, rather than letting things run
for a while as Hooper did. NASA's reason for doing this was to avoid errors
due to thermal effects. This makes sense. But what does not make sense
is that if you are trying to verify an original experiment and you make
changes, you have an obligation to also conduct the experiment in it's
original mode. To do otherwise is bad science. But what could be wrong
with testing things in an immediate on-off mode? Well, it can be seen in
other experiments that a gravitational effect sometimes results from macroscopic
spin alignment of the quantum angular momentum of a large number of microscopic
particles. It has been demonstrated in other experiments that it takes
time for these particles to come into alignment. For example in the inventions
of Henry Wallace it sometimes took minutes for the "kinemassic" gravito-
magnetic field to fully manifest itself. The reason that it takes time
for particles to come into alignment, could be much the same reason that
it takes time to permanently magnetize a magnet. Wallace found that the
"kinemassic" effect occurs with elemental materials which have a component
of unpaired spin in the atomic nucleus. This includes all common isotopes
of copper, which of course is the material used in Hooper's coils.
Incidently, NASA essentially has an economic monopoly in the lucrative
market for microgravity materials research. -- Robert Stirniman
The Hooper effect can be readily demonstrated in the "Two Moving Magnets
Experiment". In this experiment, magnetic flux is provided by equal strength
opposite pole magnets, moving uniformly in opposite directions. The induced
motional electric field that is generated in a conductor, is found to be
twice that which would result from a single magnet, while remarkably, the
sum of the magnetic B field is zero. This experiment is easy to setup and
verify in any electronics laboratory with a pair of magnets, a wire, and
a voltmeter. In fact, you may wrap the conductor, in electrostatic or magnetic
shielding, and find the same result. -- Nils Rognerud
Oleg Jefimenko, "Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation",
Electret Scientific, Star City, (1992)
Oleg Jefimenko, "Force Exerted on a Stationary Charge by a Moving Electric
Current or a Moving Magnet", American Journal of Physics, Vol 61, pages
218-222 (1993)
Apparently, there are some VERY interesting clues to the nature of
the universe that are related to the phenomenon of SPIN. It might get very
interesting if someone were to make a project of assembling in one place
all the information that has been observed, alleged, suspected, or speculated
about concerning unexpected effects related to spin, along with all the
traditional Newtonian results, stir, add some seasoning, and see what comes
out.
For example, in quantum mechanics, if you want to measure the spin axis
of an electron, you do an experiment in which you ASSUME an axis, make
a measurement of the correlation (the dot product) of that axis with the
actual axis of spin for that electron, and theory says you can determine
at least how close your guess was.
It was a major surprise for the first expermienters with this to find
that the guess was always right: whatever spin axis you assume turns out
to be correct, exactly dead accurate. You must be a VERY good guesser.
Out of this experimental result came the concept of "isospin". Which in
itself is kind of weird in that objects with zero radius can still exhibit
spinx. But I find the idea that the spin is wherever you guess it might
be to be even weirder and to need a better model that predicts this result.
-- John Sangster
Paper: gr-qc/9311036
From: jaegukim@cc.kangwon.ac.kr
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 13:47:52 +0900
Gravitational Field of a Moving Spinning Point Particle, by Jaegu Kim,
7 pages
The gravitational and electromagnetic fields of a moving charged spinning
point particle are obtained in the Lorentz covariant form by transforming
the Kerr--Newman solution in Boyer--Lindquist coordinates to the one in
the coordinate system which resembles the isotropic coordinates and then
covariantizing it. It is shown that the general relativistic proper time
at the location of the particle is the same as the special relativistic
one and the gravitational and electromagnetic self forces vanish.
Jaegu Kim, "Gravitational Field of a Moving Point Particle", Journal
of the Korean Physical Society, Vol 27 No 5,
Oct 94, Pages 484-492
Jaegu Kim, "Gravitational Field of a Moving Spinning Point Particle",
Journal of the Korean Physical Society,Vol27No5
Oct 94, Pages 479-483
In the above papers, Dr. Kim derives solutions for the Einstein-Maxwell
equations for: a charged massless point particle, a point particle having
mass but no charge, a point particle having mass and charge, a massless
point particle with charge and spin, and finally -- a point particle having
charge, mass, and spin. He determines that there is a region of space around
a charged spinning mass in which the gravitational force is negative.
The ability to generate a negative gravity effect may come as no surprise
to experimenters who have worked with Bose-Einstein condensates, superfluids,
or superconductor material in which the angular momentum of quantum level
particles can become aligned along a "macroscopic" spin axis. And it is
probably also not a surprise to those who have looked at devices such as
the inventions of Henry Wallace, in which a macroscopic body is mechanically
spun at high speed in order to cause a "kinemassic" gravito-magnetic field
due to spin alignment of the nucleus of elemental materials having an odd
number of nucleons (un-paired spin).
Paper: GR-QC/9504023
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 10:43:50 +0900
Title: Pure spin-connection formulation of gravity and classification
of energy-momentum tensors
Author: Mathias PILLIN |