Did the inhabitants of Britain once in the remote past share the land together with huge extinct animals? Fossils of ancient, long-vanished beasts like the mammoth and the rhinoceros, destroyed by a universal catastrophe have been discovered next to skulls and skeletons of prehistoric humans in various countries around the world, including United Kingdom. Man is of greater antiquity than modern science is willing to admit. Elephants and tigers did once occupy the soil of Britain. There is a lot of evidence clearly supporting this claim. 

In my book Voices from Legendary Times I write among many things about the existence of prehistoric animals and humans in America, but in this article we will take a brief look at some of the often forgotten, yet very significant discoveries in United Kingdom. In 1715, a London pharmacist named Conyers made the first known finding, which proved that the antediluvian man could also be traced back to England. 

In Gray's Inn Lane, Conyers dug up a stone axe that was lying next to elephant bones. Based on his discovery, Conyers logically concluded that the ancient man had once used stone tools to hunt elephants. The scientific community laughed away his "wild" claims, announcing that Romans had used elephants during their invasion in the time of Emperor Claudius. The explanation offered by the scientific community would indeed have been adequate, if not more "uncomfortable" discoveries followed during the next years. 

In 1790, John Frere, conducted archaeological excavation at Hoxne in Suffolk, England, where he found "thunderstones"- hand axes of flint lying beside huge bones of unknown animals. There was still a teeth remaining in the enormous animal jawbone that Frere found at a depth of twelve feet, in a layer of gravel. Frere reached the same conclusion as Conyers - the fossils and human tools were evidence of that man and extinct animals did coexist in the past.

However, the scientists were of a different opinion. Frere was of course met with nothing but scorn by the world of science. His findings were not in accordance with the historically accepted timeframe of mankind, therefore his ideas and discoveries could not be seriously treated and the case was closed. 

Later in 1824, a Roman Catholic Priest named Father J. MacEnery, unearthed human tools together with bones of extinct animals in Kent's Cavern, Devon, England. Father J. MacEnery told William Buckland, an English theologian and Dean of Westminster about his unusual finding. William Buckland made a very interesting cave discovery himself at Goat's Hole Cave near Paviland in Wales, where he found a skeleton of a young man. Buckland misidentified the remains, believing that he had unearthed the remains of a woman. He named her the "Red Lady of Paviland". Additionally, Buckland came across ancient stone tools next to the skeleton. According to the religious doctrine, Man before Adam was an impossibility. Adam was the first Man created by God. Buckland concluded therefore that his discovery along with Father J. MacEnery's dated back to the time of Jesus Christ. 
So, how could the ancient tools end up mixed with the bones of prehistoric animals? William Buckland had an answer to this question - the tools must have somehow "slipped down" to the lower, older layer were the remains of extinct animals were found. 

Some years later another curious cave finding was brought to light in Devon. In 1858, when entering a cave in Devon, William Pengelly, a schoolmaster discovered on its floor a sheet of stalagmite from three to eight inches thick having within it and on it relics of lion, hyena, bear, mammoth, rhinoceros and reindeer. 
This was yet more proof of that history is different than presented in orthodox history books. 

140 million years old hammer discovered in Britain

One of the most astonishing artefacts discovered in England is undoubtedly a little hammer, which is estimated to be 140 million years old. At first sight, this tool appears rather insignificant. However, this antediluvian relic is unique in many ways. According to modern science this hammer should not exist because a tool of this particular kind is impossible to manufacture! Yet, it is there.  Someone did produce this hammer, millions of years ago!

Examinations of the hammer conducted by independent organizations revealed that this tool consists of 96.6 % iron, 2.6 % chlorine, and 0.74 % sulphur. The hammer is almost entirely made of iron. Further examination of the hammer showed no evidence of inclusions or irregularities in the hammerhead steel. There are no traces of ingredients used for refinement such as copper, titanium, manganese, cobalt, or molybdenum, vanadium, wolfram or nickel, all of which we employ in steel-manufacturing. Based on the hammer's compositions, it would be impossible to reproduce this type of tool with help of modern technology. It therefore clear that however manufactured this hammer possessed great technological skills.

Where these antediluvian people perhaps introduced to metallurgy by the alien gods, who were active on our planet during that time? Many ancient cultures relate how wise "sky beings" instructed them in sciences like astronomy, mathematics, metallurgy and agriculture. 
Our alien gods, our ancient astronauts, were not only creators of Man, but acted also as our teachers. 

Discoveries corroborating the existence of humans and antediluvian creatures occurred regularly not only in the United Kingdom, but in other parts of Europe as well. 

In Germany, in a cave near the Bavarian city of Bayreuth, a priest named Johann Friedrich Esper found a human jaw accompanied by the remains of a giant bear. It was assumed that the now extinct bear lived in the days of the Biblical Noah, before the Flood. 

In France, Boucher de Perthes discovered in 1832, in the area of Abbeville a number of stone axes, similar to those found by John Frere in Suffolk, England. Beside the stones, Boucher de Perthes came across the bones of mammoths, rhinoceroses, bison, cave lions, and other extinct animals, which dated back to time before the Deluge. 

In Belgium, a doctor named Schmerling unearthed seven human skulls, a number of flint tools, and the bones of extinct creatures like the woolly mammoth and the European rhinoceros in caves. Dr. Schmerling concluded: "There can be no doubt that the human bones were buried at the same time and by the same cause as the other extinct species."

The coexistence of man and now extinct animals is reality. This fact can no longer be explained away. There are too many fossils proving this point. It is obvious that someone was walking on this planet long before the first modern human appeared...

by Ellen Lloyd

Author of "Voices from Legendary Times: We are a bridge between past and future."

Hammer Found in Rock in 1936 London, Texas

"Max Hahn was fishing with his family near London, Texas in June of 1936 when he found a rock with wood protruding from it. When the rock was cracked open, this octagonally shaped iron hammer was exposed. The wood handle appears to be partially coalified and has quartz and calcite crystalline inclusions. Tests performed at Battelle Laboratory document the hammer's unusual metallurgy: 96% iron, 2.6 % chlorine and 0.74 % sulfur (no carbon). Density tests indicate a casting of exceptional quality.

The enclosing rock contains Lower Cretaceous fossils. It is a concretionary sandstone nodule. The nearby cliff is made up of concretionary sandstone nodules which look exactly like the one encasing the hammer. If this nodule, with the hammer, did indeed come from the nearby cliff, evolutionary theory would have to be abandoned by the intellectually honest. This cliff is part of the Lower Cretaceous Edwards Plateau which evolutionists tell us was formed about 140 million years ago, when dinosaurs roamed the earth. Of course, the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs would destroy evolutionary theory." - SOURCE

Abstract

An iron and wooden hammer, sometimes called the "London Artifact" or "London Hammer," found by local hikers in a creek bed near London, Texas in 1936, has been promoted by Carl Baugh and other strict creationists as an out-of place artifact. They maintain that the hammer, which was partially embedded in a small, limy rock concretion, originated in a Cretaceous rock formation (or an Ordovician or Silurian one, depending on the account), thus contradicting the standard geologic timetable. However, the hammer was not documented in situ, and has not been reliably associated with any specific host formation. Other relatively recent implements have been found encased in by similar nodules, and can form within centuries or even decades under proper conditions (Stromberg, 2004). The hammer in question was probably dropped or discarded by a local miner or craftsman within the last few hundred years, after which dissolved limy sediment hardened into a nodule around it. Although a brief rebuttal to Baugh's hammer claims was made by Cole (1985), Baugh and a few other creationists continue to promote it. This review provides further analysis of the hammer and creationist claims about it. - SOURCE
 

C) 1997-2006, Glen J. Kuban

C) 1997-2006, Glen J. Kuban

C) 1997-2006, Glen J. Kuban

The hammer in the rock, called the "London Artifact" is most likely a 19th century miner’s hammer (See above picture). Dr. Murray thinks the hammer was used to fix wagon wheels. About a dozen of these hammers have been found at Scott's Bluff, Nebraska. It is not Noah's hammer as Baugh claims. - SOURCE

The wood handle is partially coalifed with quartz and calcite crystalline inclusions. Tests performed at Battelle Laboratory document the hammer’s unusual metallurgy, 96% iron, 2.6% chlorine and .74% sulfur (no carbon). Density test indicate casting of exceptional quality. A unique coating of FeO, which does not readily form under present atmospheric conditions, appears to inhibit rusting. 

SOURCE: Bible.CA

To the left is an iron cup encased in coal. It was found by Frank Kanard in 1912. The coal came from the Will Berton Coal Mine in Oklahoma. Carl Baugh claims it was made before or just after Noah's flood. The cup looks like one from the 19th century. There were no iron cups like this 5,000 years old. The iron age started about 1200 BC. The cup was probably dropped by a miner, became buried under coal, and then cemented together with water under pressure in a relatively short time. Nodules seem to easily form around objects. 
- SOURCE

Iron Pot Found in Coal in 1912

It has often been claimed by the evolutionary community that coal is hundreds of millions of years old. For example, one such coal deposit from the Wilburton, Oklahoma, mines is said to contain coal that formed about 312 million years ago. This would predate the dinosaurs by about 87 million years (according to the widely accepted evolutionary theory). Most people are not aware that many human artifacts have reportedly been found in coal. One such find occurred in 1912 at the Municipal Electric Plant in Thomas, Oklahoma. Frank Kennard was breaking a piece of coal to throw it into the furnace. As he broke it this iron pot fell from the center of the coal.

His story is as follows and is contained in his signed affidavit. Mr. Kennard said, "While I was working in the Municipal Electric Plant in Thomas, Okla. in 1912, I came upon a solid chunk of coal which was too large to use. I broke it with a sledge hammer. This iron pot fell from the center, leaving the impression, or mould of the pot in a piece of the coal. Jim Stull (an employee of the company) witnessed the breaking of the coal, and saw the pot fall out. I traced the source of the coal, and found that it came from the Wilburton, Oklahoma Mines."

This find demonstrates that the assigned age of coal (given by evolutionists) is fallacious.
 
 

These two artifacts, while extremely interesting do appear to be generated by the formation of new rock around an iten dropped by a miner. Stalactite minerals are mostly calcium and as such grow fairly rapidly, one has only to look at calcim buildup around the house to understand this. Based on our evaluation we feel that these two are neither ancient artifacts, nor proof that rock or coal is not as old as scientists say. Some form of rocks with the right water and pressure considerations can form rapidly, especially as concretions around an object.

It is also significant to note that the current owners will not release them for scientific dating studies

All pictures and photos on this page, unless otherwise noted, have been gathered from pubic domain sources or are available under GNU License. Further documentation is available on our Copyright Page and our Legal Department.

Article Quotes all have links to their appropriate source and are noted. All other text not so noted is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

All information on this page is used only for non profit educational purposes. All reasonable attempts have been made that no credits are missed, but with a work of this size omissions may occur. If you see anything of yours that has not been properly credited or wish to have removed please contact the Webmaster